A Public Service Announcement
Don't Like
Our Language?
Fuck You, Jackass.
Just kidding. Kind of. But seriously — every word on this site is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States. Repeatedly. Unanimously, even.
Here are the receipts. (We love receipts.)
Amendment I — Ratified December 15, 1791
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
— The Constitution of the United States
Supreme Court Precedent — a.k.a. “We Did the Homework”
Cohen v. California (1971)
U.S. Supreme CourtPaul Robert Cohen wore a jacket that said "Fuck the Draft" into a courthouse. The Supreme Court ruled it was protected speech under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
“One man's vulgarity is another's lyric.”— Justice John Marshall Harlan IIRead Full Opinion
Matal v. Tam (2017)
U.S. Supreme CourtThe government tried to deny a trademark for "The Slants" as offensive. The Supreme Court struck down the restriction, ruling that the government cannot suppress speech it finds distasteful.
“Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend.”— Justice Samuel AlitoRead Full Opinion
Iancu v. Brunetti (2019)
U.S. Supreme CourtErik Brunetti tried to trademark "FUCT" for his clothing brand. The PTO refused. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the ban on "immoral or scandalous" trademarks violated the First Amendment.
“There are a great many immoral and scandalous ideas in the world, and the Lanham Act covers them all.”— Justice Elena KaganRead Full Opinion
Snyder v. Phelps (2011)
U.S. Supreme CourtWestboro Baptist Church protested a military funeral with deeply offensive signs. The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that even the most outrageous speech on public issues is protected.
“Speech is powerful. It can stir people to action, move them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and — as it did here — inflict great pain. On the facts before us, we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker.”— Chief Justice John RobertsRead Full Opinion
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (1988)
U.S. Supreme CourtLarry Flynt published a crude parody of Jerry Falwell. The Court unanimously held that public figures cannot recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress from publications that could not reasonably be taken as stating facts.
“At the heart of the First Amendment is the recognition of the fundamental importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern.”— Chief Justice William RehnquistRead Full Opinion
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
U.S. Supreme CourtGregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag at a political protest. Texas convicted him. The Supreme Court reversed it 5-4, ruling that even deeply offensive symbolic expression is protected speech.
“If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself disagreeable or offensive.”— Justice William BrennanRead Full Opinion
Reno v. ACLU (1997)
U.S. Supreme CourtCongress passed the Communications Decency Act to censor "indecent" and "offensive" speech on the internet. The Supreme Court struck it down unanimously, ruling that online speech gets full First Amendment protection.
“The interest in encouraging freedom of expression in a democratic society outweighs any theoretical but unproven benefit of censorship.”— Justice John Paul StevensRead Full Opinion
TL;DR
Profanity is protected speech. The Supreme Court has said so at least 5 times. Our opinions are our opinions. Our facts are sourced and cited. And our language?
Constitutionally protected, baby.
If you're still offended, we recommend the full text of the Constitution. It's a good read.
One More Thing
And if you think quoting the Constitution makes us sound like conservatives, Trumpers, right-wingers, or whatever label you want to slap on us, then fuck you, jackass.

When NPCs think your appreciation of the First Amendment means you're conservative.
We don't do political parties. Any of them. Left, right, center. Different jerseys, same owners.
The same corporations screwing consumers are the ones funding both sides. They lobby to gut the rules, then operate in the gaps those missing rules create. That's not a bug. That's the business model.
Politics is a control paradigm. Keep people fighting each other so nobody looks up. And while everyone's distracted, corporate accountability just disappears.
The Constitution belongs to the people. Not to a party. Not to a corporation. We quote it because it's the only thing that actually protects us from all of them.
This site is for consumers.